no. (roses_rejoice) wrote,

A wee rantlet

Sex is not a "need". People need food, water, sufficient clothing and shelter to survive. People do not need sex to survive.

Even if people did, in some sense of the word, have this so-called need, presumably they have a hand at the end of their arm. Even armless people can access a variety of other methods that do not include another person.

Corollary: Spending time with someone, paying for their lunch or even making out with them does not, in any way, entitle the time-spender, lunch payer or makeout partner to full sexual gratification. Nor does it entitle him or her to pout, yell or otherwise act like an ass when s/he doesn't get "any".
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded